On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 18:29 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > I'm waiting for the decision (yours) of making this optional using a > compilation flag or at run-time.
Let's do this in the usual manner: 0. Polish the patch in the usual way: make sure it follows the indentation and naming conventions of the surrounding code, etc. 1. Branch evolution-data-server into HEAD (development, with Philip's patch), and the stable branch (without the patch). 2. Make the patch *mandatory* in HEAD, so that it gets a good amount of testing. 3. ??? 4. Profit!!! I'd suggest that (3) become "write a good stress-test suite for Camel, independent of Evolution". We need that anyway. Novell already has a bunch of LDTP stuff to test the Evo mailer from the user's viewpooint - run those tests on the patched version to see how well they work. [Varadhan, those tests are already part of our QA process, aren't they?] Federico _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
