On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 11:09 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote: > > * Should we include Gtk# in the Bindings suite? > > - short term > > - it hasn't been proposed for 2.16, but we could grandfather it in > > - the release management issues have largely been solved, aside from Gtk# > > not being split between Platform and Desktop (stable and unstable) APIs > > which is pretty important in terms of ISV/ISD communication and so on > > - bindings are a very important part of GNOME, and our value proposition > > - it seems that few people are concerned about Gtk# adopting the release > > process and other standards, then being included in our Bindings suite > > - a social/business/non-technical issue may persist regarding GNOME using > > or endorsing a Microsoft derived technology; some users/vendors may not > > appreciate that, to the point that they may choose to disassociate from > > the GNOME project (this shouldn't be dismissed out of hand) > > Definitely. > > They're already widely used and they seem to be mature enough to be included > in the suite. > > I cannot se a reason why they shouldn't if they follow the bindings/platform > stability rules and are prepared to follow the release schedule.
100% agree. I don't know C# and prefer Python for RAD, but Gtk# is well
tested, well maintained, well documented and well used. There is no
reason why they should not be in Bindings.
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
