On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 20:09 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > Is the goal here to reinvent Gtk# in Gtkmm's image, or to satisfy the > > requirements of the release set? Last time I checked, libglade was a > > platform library. > > I do not understand you (or your colleagues) always need to be so > aggressive and insulting every time this is discussed. What part of my > email made you feel that was necessary?
Sorry you felt insulted. Thank you for your suggestion. I am well acquainted with your opinion on this matter. We have considered and declined the idea of splitting our binding into a set of tarballs for each bound library. We think that we are already providing a very packaging-friendly set of bindings. Pardon my abruptness. -- Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
