Hi Jeff; On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 01:22 -0700, Jeff Waugh wrote: > <quote who="Emmanuele Bassi">
> > I personally love when a discussion about the release takes place; I love > > it a little less when it happens three months after I started the > > discussion, after I received a "go ahead" from the release team, and > > especially when the integration has already been done and releases are > > already out. > > > > This is really timely. Not. > > (Additionally, we should absolutely be willing to go back on changes we make > during the development cycle, otherwise we won't ever be bold enough to try > out crazy things with the knowledge that we can revert if needs be. So I can > understand your frustration, but it's not very different to other situations > we should be prepared to handle.) Don't get me wrong: I was ready to roll out every change. Or even not to commit the merge. That's why I asked first, three months ago. But having received a "go ahead" and having release five versions without even a *slight hint* that my decision was questionable is frustrating at best. If even a single mail saying "we'll keep it in check and decide later" would have been useful: I would have kept a finger on the trigger. Now it looks like I did something wrong because I merged a utility without the consent of the community - and that makes me look I'm stupid. Ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi, E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
