On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 18:17 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote: > Sounds like a good 2.18 goal. > > On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 12:35 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: > > As far as all the spell checking libraries go, I think it's safe for us > > to bless enchant as the API for applications to use. It modularly > > supports all of the ispell/spell/etcspell... backends. And the actual > > backend in use there, may depend on what language you're writing in, > > as some don't have support for a particular language at all, while > > others may only provide overlapping support. As far as the GUI side > > goes we really only have GtkSpell and gnome-spell. As the latter uses > > bonobo, it may well be worth our time to make Evolution use GtkSpell > > instead, and work on ways to get GtkSpell into GTK+ proper, so that > > any editing widgets on the desktop, can just inherently have spell > > checking support.
I'll have a go at the Evolution / GtkSpell integration after things settle down a bit. Matthew Barnes _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
