JP Rosevear wrote: > The problem is, I've seen no unequivocal declaration about gtk+ and glib > accepting these higher level abstractions, so perhaps matthias can > comment, because historically this has not been the case and is a > primary concern for me at least. >
My perspective, step 1 is decide what is right, and step 2 is talk people into it. I don't have reason to believe there's a fundamental disagreement with the gtk maintainers, though. Most of the "kinds of dependency" I listed in that other mail are already used in gtk. Havoc _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
