Corey Burger wrote:
> <snip>
>   
>> For me, I would say No, as don't see really a reason to include LAT in
>> GNOME, because administrating LDAP is not a common task. Even if we
>> consider the Administrator platform (pessulus, sabayon), these tools
>> are for administrating GNOME desktop, and not for general
>> administration.
>>     
>
> Administrating LDAP = administrating computer (of which, there are
> more desktops than servers) = administrating GNOME.
>
> Ask Jorge Castro (whiprush) or any of the other people who deploy
> GNOME in a corporate environment about this. Having a good set of
> tools for this task is something GNOME has been lacking for awhile.
> This is why the admin suite was created in the first place.
>
>
>   
As an administrator of gnome desktops, I add my voice to yours to say 
that a better integration of the Gnome desktop with LDAP would be a 
great enhancement. I think LDAP is used more and more in the corporate 
environement, replacing old things like NIS on Unix and making the 
integration easier in a Windows environement with an AD (I don't like 
this but it is the corporate reality).
Now I can't say for the moment if LAT is the right tool to achieve this, 
since I didn't find the time to test it yet but it seems at least promising.

Sorry for my bad english,

Regards,

Fred


_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to