Am Montag, den 25.09.2006, 09:06 +0100 schrieb Mark McLoughlin: > My take on what happened is that we had 3 different implementations of > a simple tool, each taking a different approach. Hopefully lessons were > learnt from each, and the end result is better for that. > > Your code (and my code) isn't being used now, but it was still useful > for us to write that code, IMHO.
I agree that playing around with different ideas isn't useless. However, the main conclusion should be that before starting from the ground up with new projects that have very similar objectives - because of some slightly different emphasis - one should clearly specify the plans and discuss them with the involved parties. Often, deficiencies are well-known, and at that early stage of projects a coordinated resolution involving all parties is not only less confusing for the users (++) but also more social (+++). -- Christian Neumair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
