On 10/2/06, Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 10:49 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > > There was once a complaint that gamin was unmaintained and buggy such > > that fam was then recommended, yet I see gamin instead of fam @ > > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies. > > What am I missing? > > I'm not sure where you got this idea. I can definately tell you that fam > is much worse maintained than gamin. Its a code drop from SGI from many > years ago that has recieved little maintenance since then.
It's a recommended dependency of nautilus in Debian Etch. Removing gamin fixed this bug for me: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373814 > Now, gamin isn't perfectly maintained either, but with the last bunch of > fixes (in cvs, don't think there has been a release with them yet) it > seems to work fine. Good to know... _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
