Johan Dahlin wrote:
> Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>
>>Vincent Untz wrote:
>>
>>>Le vendredi 29 septembre 2006, à 22:46, Tristan Van Berkom a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>>to say "do we want glade as part of some gnome module set" ? any ideas
>>>>on that ?
>>>
>>>Straight question: if we integrate an interface builder in GNOME, how
>>>can we choose between glade, gazpacho and stetic?
>>>
>>
>>I guess a reply on my behalf is called for here ;-)
>>
>>A few points I guess I'll raise in the favor of Glade;
>>
>> o Support for all widgets in gtk+ including depricated ones
>
>
> Depends on what supported means;
> GtkTreeView, GtkIconView & friends are not really supported by glade.
>
> Nor by Gazpacho, Stetic or anything else...
Yes,
I should say "anything supported by libglade" - non-widget objects
have been supported by the glade tool itself since about one year, integrating
non-widget objects in the GTK widget catalog has been put off untill we have
an appropriate loader (i.e. the Gtk+ builder for 2.12 or patches to libglade).
Cheers,
-Tristan
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
