On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:04 -0500, Mark Drago wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 22:56 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote: > > Jason D. Clinton wrote: > > > > > It seems to me that being able to easily build GNOME would go a long way > > > towards people knowing where we stand as a community during our > > > development > > > cycles. > > > > > > How is the work on that coming along? > > > > It is doing fine, thanks for asking :) Seriously there have been > > very few glitches in 2.17 for the moment, notably thanks to frozen > > external dependencies. > > > > Unfortunately, this is just an answer to 'being able to build GNOME', > > even without problems it is still a huge task, the best things would > > be do have experimental packages (be it rpm or deb) for consumption, > > we are not there (yet). > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Frederic > > Frederic, > > I did some work on getting jhbuild to create RPM packages last year [1]. > While I didn't fully complete it at the time I am still interested in > making this a reality. I am curious to know who is working on this and > how I might be able to help. I have been building Gnome 2.17 with > jhbuild with the idea that I would try to resurrect my previous work, > but if someone else is actively working on it I would like to help them. > we are planning, for the opensuse.org project, to use the Build service (http://build.opensuse.org) to create packages from unstable GNOME. It supports SuSE, Fedora, Debian and others in the future, so you might want to join the mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and join the GNOME packaging theme there. -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
