David Bolter wrote: > If it is indeed "very much more usable", then you have my vote as long > "usable" includes "accessible". > http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/
By usable I nearly meant "has enough features to be useful". Accessibility and usability audits would, of course, be a prerequisite to making any changes at all. -Thomas _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
