Danilo Šegan wrote: > You guys seem to be engaging in the SVN vs. GIT (or any other RCS) > again. I thought that this discussion was over, and I am not getting > into it now ;) >
Just as a point of information - the last time this discussion was had, there was a *lot* of support for a *lot* of different VCSs. I think Mr Hallendal summarised the consensus quite well: "But having Subversion instead of CVS is a lowrisk/high-gain transition that we can do today and it makes a lot of sense doing so." [1] So while anyone arguing "Stop the SVN transition now, go to GIT instead" is clearly on crack, my impression is that the community is in favour of at least investigating VCS alternatives. Cheers, Andrew [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-hackers/2005-June/msg00044.html _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
