On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 23:47 +0100, Danilo Šegan wrote: > Today at 23:22, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > > Even better, you don't have to give a cvs/svn account to every > > contributor. Allowing the barrier of entry to be a lot easier. > > You guys seem to be engaging in the SVN vs. GIT (or any other RCS) > again. I thought that this discussion was over, and I am not getting > into it now ;)
Please, don't misunderstand me. I just sent my message because I thought you were concerned about the wrong issue. > I am against having more than one way of accessing source code for > GNOME source code. It's as simple as that. For the benefit of > translators, documentors, artists, and heck, even developers (imagine > this: to install GNOME, get gnome-panel using bzr, gtk+ and glib using > git, nautilus using SVN, ...). That sounds different that you pointed first. I agree. > I am also against GNOME SysAdmin team having to provide for different > project hosting services. But if they feel they can take it, then by > all means, be my guests and lets have git.gnome.org and bzr.gnome.org :) People already does in their own pets projects. -- Germán Poó-Caamaño http://www.ubiobio.cl/~gpoo/ Concepción - Chile _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
