Le mardi 09 janvier 2007, à 08:06, Adam Schreiber a écrit : > On 1/9/07, John Stowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <confused questions> > > I read the FAQ and I dont know how seahorse relates to > > gnome-keyring-manager?. One is keys and the other is keyrings. > > It's true that it's not that clear what the difference is. In > general, seahorse wraps multiple low level libraries/programs that > relate to encryption and authentication: gpg, ssh, gnome-keyring. > gnome-keyring-manager only wraps gnome-keyring. > > > Are two > > applications needed considering keys, encryption, keyrings and the > > whole idea of it is confusing? > > </confused question> > > Eventually not. In fact in response to a feature request to add a way > to change the "master password" of a gnome-keyring we've started to > wrap more of the functionality exposed [1]. If implementing all the > functionality of gnome-keyring is completed, gnome-keyring-manager > would be redundant.
I love seahorse and I want it in. I liked how the maintainers quickly replied to our questions, and implemented additional features. As to the seahorse/gnome-keyring-manager question: it might really be confusing to have both of them in the long term. Is removing gnome-keyring-manager a goal we can set for 2.20? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
