Le mercredi 10 janvier 2007, à 12:23, Naba Kumar a écrit : > On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 22:41 +0000, Rob Bradford wrote: > We have a beta release coming up in next few days that will pave the way > to our 2.x stable line. > > Now about including in GNOME 2.18 release, I agree it's probably not > wise to take Anjuta 2.x line for that. Looking at the schedule, we can > at most come up with a beta release and it may not be still be > acceptable for the GNOME release.
I have two concerns for Anjuta. The first one is related to this: I guess it'd be better for Anjuta-in-GNOME to have releases more frequently (but of course with less changes). Adopting our release schedule is quite important in terms of release management, and from what I can see, I believe Anjuta is not ready for this. Maybe it'd be better to wait for the next release cycle? The second concern is not a real concern: I'm a vi-addict and so it's really difficult for me to evaluate Anjuta ;-) > We have Anjuta 1.2.4a, the last stable release, that can be considered > for the GNOME devel suite release. Granted it's not as feature filled as > 2.x line, but it is stable, has basic interface with glade and devhelp > and no dependencies to gdl/gnome-build. Is there any opposition to use > stable Anjuta 1.2.4a release for the suite? Is it still maintained? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
