2007/1/12, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Having tried tracker 0.5.3 for a couple of days what I have to say is:
1. it uses little memory;
2. it requires _a lot_ of CPU power.
Basically point 2 is a killer. No one is going to want to run this
except in servers. Keeping the CPU busy almost 100% of the time is not
nice: consumes more power, gets my computer fan running faster and more
loudly.. I can't even begin to imagine what a nightmare it will be for
laptop users..
How much cpu does updatedb takes? It is what we are using with
gnome-search-tool right now. Everytime cron start it, it starts eating my
cpu every day.
Tracker don't have to every file every day since it uses inotify and keeps
track of what's been indexed. From a T-S-T inclusion point of view, I can't
see anything but benfits.
Maybe this kind of indexing technology, be it tracker or beagle, is
simply not something that we want to shove into users' desktops. Either
this gets much much better optimised in the future, or we have to wait
for more powerful hardware. In any case, I'm -1 for including tracker
in GNOME 2.18; let's wait and see how this evolves at GNOME 2.20 time.
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The universe is always one step beyond logic.
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
Un saludo,
Alberto Ruiz
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
