Rodney Dawes wrote On 01/16/07 14:14,:
>On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:21 +0000, Bill Haneman wrote: > > >>I have to disagree here. While it's a nice idea with some utility, and >>Andy is to be thanked for doing the work, it simply cannot deliver the >>goal of readily differentiable monochrome icons across the desktop - the >>stock graphics are just too 'busy'. There's really no substitute for >>purpose-built bold, monochrome icons. >> >> > >This is just not true. The way the automation works, is that it doesn't >use all of the detail of the original icon. It does add a little more >work to creating the icons, but not as much as actually creating an >entirely separate theme. What you do is use certain names for elements >in the icon, and the automation code ignores other elements and only >shows the appropriate paths, for the type of a11y icon needed. > >You really should look into what he's doing and how he's doing it, >before you just write it off completely. > > There's a difference between this approach of successive detail, and the approach of purpose-built icons. I stand by my previous statement. Bill >-- dobey > > > > _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
