On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 14:46 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 13:26 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, gnome-i18n has already become the de facto > > list for l10n, so naming a new i18n list would be tricky. > > gnome-i18n-devel?
And how would this differ significantly in practice from
gtk-i18n-list?
- Owen
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
