On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 09:02 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:54 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > I don't know exactly what kind of info we can figure out, but at the
> > very least we should be able to handle the cases you mention above.
>
> direct/none == "always cache"
> manual == "cache for this protocol" (ie. http/https/ftp)
> PAC/WPAD == "never cache"
>
> The reason you never cache for PACs is that they are sometimes used for
> load balancing, timed access (ie. 8-5), etc. Yes, horrible I know.
Is it possible to do some limited amount of caching. Say with a
time-to-live so you cache the resuts for a few seconds at least?
I guess its not really possible since the pacs are freeform javascript.
Suck...
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He's a shy Amish grifter trapped in a world he never made. She's a tortured
hypochondriac queen of the dead from aristocratic European stock. They fight
crime!
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
