On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:25 +0000, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:17 +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:08 +0000, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > A bug [1] has been opened recently for gnome-power-manager which removes > > > the use of libgnomeui which reportedly makes the applications startup > > > quicker (as about 25 less libraries are loaded) and use a lot less > > > memory. I've not tested this myself, so this may be wildly inaccurate. > > > > > > Now, while the rest of the patch is hardly invasive, replacing > > > gnome_program_init with gtk_init removes bug buddy support and maybe > > > other stuff I'm not aware of. I think gnome-power-manager needs bug > > > buddy integration, so this might be the killer of this patch. > > > > > > So the real question is, do we really need to load the whole of the > > > giant libgnomeui just to integrate with bug buddy and open a yelp file? > > > Is using libgnomeui essentially cost-free if it's being used by other > > > open programs? Should libgnomeui be chopped into smaller pieces? Am I > > > asking too many questions? :-) > > > > It's not that tricky to copy and paste the libgnomeui code that handles > > sigsegv and calls bug-buddy, the code is pretty small. I'd do that. > > Maybe GTK+ should have a hook for a process to call on sigsegv... > > That's obviously the right thing to do. Same goes for Help support. > yeah, those are the things that make lots of sense for my GtkDesktop object:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305688 -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
