On 4/8/07, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 04:01:14PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Given the length of Redhat, SuSE and Debian release cycles, this will > > just make bug-buddy useless for many stable users. Ideally you could > > Honestly, I think that <=2.14 bugreports are useless. Dropping <=2.16 > feels way too soon, however, I also want to keep Bugzilla usable (the > incoming bug rate is way too high). Further, as soon as a GNOME is > released as stable, the old one is forgotten about. > Note: we don't receive many <=2.14 bug-buddy bugreports (mostly due to > using sendmail to send it). And it was going to be ceased with the > release of 2.20 anyway.
[Responding a bit slowly...] I'm all in favor of dropping <= 2.14 bugreports, mainly because of the sendmail and yet-another-bugzilla-parsing-script issue. So +1 from me on that. I wouldn't want to see 2.16 bugreports dropped, especially not this early. It'd be really cool if we could make this kind of thing product-specific and have it be a maintainer choice on which bugreports are considered "old" enough to be automatically dropped in the future. Just my $0.02 (even though you probably already knew my answers) since I didn't see too many other people responding to this specific issue... Elijah _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
