On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > Hi all, > > So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with > a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow > the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding > such modules as time has gone on, but there are still lots of existing > modules like this from 2.0 and early 2.x days. Problem is, I wasn't > around for all the discussions way back then, and I really don't know > the state of all modules (nor even all the reasons for this > splitting). > > It'd be really helpful if people could read over my initial draft and > provide corrections and clarifications: > > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/SeparateReleaseCycleModules
Pango totally follows GNOME's release cycle. Dasher does too as far as I remember. > Thanks, > Elijah -- behdad http://behdad.org/ "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
