On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:16:39PM -0400, Thomas Thurman wrote: > Thomas Thurman > to Bastien > > show details > 23:15 (0 minutes ago) > On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 00:36 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > 2. The content resembles the following: > > > > Some Name > > E-mail: some email-address invalid > > Userid: svn-account-name > > 1. "Some Name" is their legal name, without any leading "Name:" or anything?
We basically don't care what the name is. We are only interested in the LDAP userid. I don't trust a name to be unique, so that is ignored. > 2. We have a ton more information than that in our MAINTAINERS, > including short descriptions of the tasks allocated to each > maintainer, and subheadings for active/emeritus maintainers. Are there > comments allowed? Or should I add "Status: Active", "Tasks: > Maintaining wombats"? Maybe "X-Status: Active"? We aren't interested in inactive maintainers. So just make sure you don't list them using E-mail / Userid. This to avoid allowing them to still approve SVN accounts. > 3. One of our maintainers prefers not to put his RFC822 address in > files; he writes his address with a space instead of the atpersat. Is > this acceptable in the "E-mail" field? Probably ok if every '@' and '.' in the email address is replaced by a space. The intention is to find the userid in LDAP. The email address is already in LDAP (although likely some old unused one as you currently cannot update that yourself). Note: Do not protect [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] this way. Although as soon as you list the Userid, the script shouldn't care anyway. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
