For us it doesn't really matter because conary takes care of running gtk-update-icon-cache when the icons in a package change or a new package containing icons are installed.
Elliot On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 16:44 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > Hi, > > I just saw this http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/AppIcon about making > apps update the GTK+ icon cache during "make install". > > This would be fine in a tarball-only world, but I wonder if distros will > just end up patching out that part of Makefiles, and calling > gtk-update-icon-cache on their own. > > For example, in openSUSE we update the icon cache separately from > package installation, with the idea that the cache will only be updated > once even if many packages are installed. (The really right way may be > to use an RPM %posttrans - no idea if that works.) > > So, do we really need this in tarballs? > > Federico > > _______________________________________________ > distributor-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/distributor-list -- Elliot Peele rPath, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 919.851.3984 2117 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
