On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 04:41 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:24:57AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 19:41 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > > > I can't speak for libxml++ maintainer, but given that libxml++ depends > > > on Glib::ustring, it should stay at most in the bindings.\ > > > > That's a strange logic. External dependencies should be allowed to use, > > for instance, glib. > > > > If libxml is removed from the GNOME Platform then libxml++ should be > > removed too. (I'm the maintainer). > > That's also a strange logic to me. libxml2 gets out of the GNOME platform > because I think it comes with the OS and its updates are really OS related > not GNOME releases related. If that's the case for libxml++ too then this > makes sense, but I'm not sure it's true at this point.
The GNOME Platform Bindings are meant to wrap the GNOME Development Platform. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
