Who wrote: > > http://live.gnome.org/GtkLove doesn't even mention that anyone marking > a bug as being a GnomeLove bug should be prepared to help a beginner > to solve it (this is also likely to lead to 'misuse', I guess): > > "Love Bug List > > This list is intended as collection of bugs suitable for novice GTK+ > hackers. Add items to it (adding the 'gnome-love' keyword to the bug) > only if you think they could be fixed in a reasonable time frame by a > free software developer without much experience in GTK+. If you are > unsure, add it. Please do not use this list as a personal whishlist of > issues you'd like to see fixed. " > > Specifically, I think that the "If you are unsure, add it" comment > could lead to frustration? > > Also > http://live.gnome.org/GnomeLove does not make it specifically clear > anywhere that there are people to support anyone fixing a 'GnomeLove' > bug, in contrast The 'Mentored Projects' sections is specifically > mentioned, http://live.gnome.org/MentoredProjects, with mentoring > being a clear component - could that page also mention that a > GnomeLove bug, in it's own way, is like a mentored project? I guess > just a few tweaks of both pages could be very useful here?
What about a third category (after love-bug and mentored-project) such as 'gnome-academic-bug' intended to be a student project for few weeks, few months or a semester ? Computer science education is more and more in need of original projects for their students and if you could just mark some bugs and/or some wishes to be feasible by some students it would be nice. In a matter of fact I'm already using the bug-list of Gnome for getting some projects for my master students. :) Regards -- Emmanuel Fleury Put something new in the World. -- Iben Hjejle (as Laura in "High-Fidelity") _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
