Le dimanche 18 novembre 2007, à 00:15 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : > Sorry to join late in the discussion, just back from my vacation. > > On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 11:38 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Maybe 95% of the plugins of evo should not be displayed as plugins. They > > should either be preferences in the standard preferences dialog, or they > > should be enabled anyway. > > 95% is a bit much ;-)
Yeah, sometimes (often?), I need to lie to make my point ;-) > > This is not only true for evo, rhythmbox has the same issue (although > > there are less plugins there) > > > > (and of course, +1 for splitting evo) > > Vincent, at GUADEC 06 I demoed split. Even there was a external patch > that was floating in hackers list some time back. Unfortunately all > those break the assumptions of Evolution. There are lot more dependent > issues which needs to be addressed before split. I guess it would take a > separate release for that. The current team is focussing on > stability/performance/bugs of Evolution and MAPI based Exchange > connector. If we are out of MAPI atleast, we would definitely have more > time to do things required for split. Split itself would take pretty > less effort :-). Believe me that most of the team too understands it and > we have already done some thoughts for its dependent issues > ( http://www.go-evolution.org/UAM ) and it is part of our planning as > well ( http://www.go-evolution.org/Evo2.22 ). I hope that we would have > some dedicated resources for it pretty soon. Really great to hear that! Also, since I've been playing a bit with evo lately, I have felt the stability/performance work being done in evo since quite some time. Pretty good stuff :-) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
