2007/12/2, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Dec 2, 2007 3:46 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > In case anyone is interested, feel free to try out a 100% WAF-ied > > version of gnome-python: > > > > http://www.gnome.org/~gjc/gnome-python-2.21.0.tar.bz2 > > > > The WAF based tarball (including a self contained waf script, which is > > all you need to build) is 249K, while an autotools version is 424K. I > > could reduce the size even more if I removed configure.ac and the > > Makefile.am's. It also builds much faster, especially if you count > > the ./autogen.sh part, though I didn't to get actual numbers. > > Ooh, I'd love to see timing numbers. The size differences are pretty > impressive; it would likely make a noticable impact on times for > building releases for garnome users, release team members, and others. > Anyone want to cook up a patch for libwnck/metacity so I can see how > quick and small it is on my module(s)? (Hey, if I'm too lazy to deal > with autotools for my modules and almost always delegate it, I can > also be too lazy to deal with any other system, right?)
I might try. So far, libwnck looks pretty simple, except for the glib-mkenums which seems to call a lot of shell commands. What's exactly glib-mkenum used for? (I kind of guess from the name, but I would like to have more background of the problem that it solves). Does anyone has done this mkenum thing with waf already? -- Cheers, Alberto Ruiz
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
