On Dec 5, 2007 9:51 AM, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But that still leaves a basic premise here that I object to: that
> a self-signed certificate is worth something. Roughly speaking, the
> networking world is divided into two pieces:

Maybe to alleviate some of the disharmony of self-signed certs with
GNOME sites, the GNOME Foundation could run its own CA which sends a
cert to each foundation member and issues certs to the GNOME family of
sites as well.  At that point Epiphany could install the GNOME
Foundation CA's signing cert by default.

Cheers,

Adam
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to