What happened to the discussion about blessed dependency on Telepathy and
friends? I've already made my concerns about Empathy well-known so I will
not repeat them here, but what I think is far more important to discuss is
why telepathy should or should not be a part of the Gnome desktop experience
out of the box. In the games module, for instance, there will be pressure to
launch multi-player games from and over telepathy. I'm sure other module
maintainers will feel the same kinds of pressures to implement this
additional interface.

So in summary, WTF is Telepathy and Topaz and why should I care? (Or for the
tin-foil-hat brigade: why does Nokia/Collabora care about this so much?)

On 12/19/07, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Homepage: http://live.gnome.org/Empathy
> svn/git/bzr/...: http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/empathy/
> Proposal on d-d-l:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2007-September/msg00301.html
>
> Short description:
> ==================
> Empathy consists of a rich set of reusable instant messaging widgets,
> and a GNOME client using those widgets. It uses Telepathy and Nokia's
> Mission Control, and reuses Gossip's UI. The main goal is to permit
> desktop integration by providing libempathy and libempathy-gtk
> libraries. libempathy-gtk is a set of powerful widgets that can be
> embeded into any GNOME application.
>
> Requires new external dependencies:
> ===================================
> libtelepathy, telepathy-glib, libmissioncontrol
> (libtelepathy will go away at some point in the future)
>
> Summary so far:
> ===============
> + a few -1 from people thinking it's useless duplication of
>    pidgin/ekiga/etc. work or not wanting to use telepathy
> + some +1 from people thinking it's going the right way
> + questions about stability
> + questions about feature set that might not be complete yet
> + API documentation needed to be written (I don't know the
>    current status)
> + no API stability guarantee yet
> + current license of the libraries is GPL
>    [context: if the libraries are proposed for the platform later, they
>    will need to be LGPL]
>
> Xavier can probably send an update about the feature set, the API doc
> status, and the license.
>
> Vincent
>
> --
> Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to