On Dec 21, 2007 3:57 PM, Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The gio documentation itself could use some love (at least > according to what I'm seeing on library.gnome.org). That > is at least partially relevant to the discussion, because: > 1) gvfs is only relevant if we use gio, and > 2) gio should be well-documented if we expect developers > to switch to it. > On the other hand, it's not as if gnome-vfs has exemplary > documentation, and that's the status quo if we don't start > using gio.
I don't know whats on library.gnome.org, but the api docs in the gio module are at 98% coverage right now. You can always do better, and the docs are still a bit light in terms of concepts, examples and migration instructions, but the API reference itself is in decent shape, I think. Matthias _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
