Hi, 2008/2/1, Elijah Newren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jan 31, 2008 3:21 PM, Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 21:49 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote: > > > ================================= > > > GNOME 2.21.90 Development Release > > > ================================= > > > > Hey Elijah, > > > > I noticed that you folks picked up gnome-sharp-2.19.91 for this release. > > In our current development releases, we have split the existing > > gnome-sharp binding set into two packages: gnome-sharp and > > gnome-desktop-sharp. > > > > We have moved our rsvg, vte, and gtkhtml bindings from gnome-sharp to > > gnome-desktop-sharp in an attempt to clarify the stable/unstable status > > of the APIs. We also have added a few new bindings to > > gnome-desktop-sharp. > > > > I didn't officially pursue inclusion of gnome-desktop-sharp for 2.22 > > because of the timing of when all this started coming together, though > > at this point, I'm confident gnome-desktop-sharp 2.20 will be ready when > > GNOME 2.22 ships. > > > > It would be great if the gnome-desktop-sharp package can be included in > > 2.22. If it's too late or too controversial to do so at this point, I > > would suggest that you revert to gnome-sharp 2.16.x for 2.22, since > > shipping gnome-sharp 2.20 without gnome-desktop-sharp will remove > > functionality. > > > > Let me know if I can provide any more info. > > Given that it's primarily a split of an existing module, I think it'd > make sense to include both rather than reverting. > > What does everyone else say?
I see no problem with inclusing both. Just one question: you said "gnome-desktop-sharp 2.20 will be ready when GNOME 2.22 ships". Does it mean it's not ready now? What's missing? --lucasr _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
