Le jeudi 13 mars 2008, à 10:59 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit : > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 11:43 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > GNOME 2.22.0 was released yesterday, and we're already starting to look > > at what the future will bring us. Or at what we'll bring to GNOME in the > > future. Or at what we'll bring to the future. Or maybe we can skip this > > step and use time travel? You know, I've watched again 'Back to the > > future' a few days ago, and... Hmm? You're not interested in my life? > > Okay... :-) Really good movie, though. I especially like the moment > > where... oops, sorry. > > > > Since we're starting a new development cycle which will lead us to GNOME > > 2.24 in September 2008, now is a good time to think about potential new > > modules for 2.24. You can go wild and propose your favorite new modules > > for inclusion in GNOME. > > > > How should you proceed? It's easy, all the information is on: > > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/ModuleProposing > > This is not on that page (can we add it?), and we seem to > have problems with this every release cycle. So here it > is again: We do not expect you to have documentation for > your module when you propose it. We understand that you > might not be good at writing documentation, and that you > haven't found people to do it for you. > > But we do expect you to CONTACT THE DOCUMENTATION TEAM > BEFORE THE MODULE DECISIONS. We need an early heads-up. > We need to know what state your documentation is in, if > it exists at all, and what needs to be done. If you > don't contact us before module inclusion discussions > heat up (looks like early July), I'll give you a big > thumbs down in my documentation reviews.
Good point. Feel free to go ahead and edit the wiki page to mention this. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
