2008/3/25, Mathias Hasselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> By making Empathy an official GNOME component, we tell all our users,
> that Pidgin is legacy and that they should switch to our superior
> solution. As good engineers we would have integrated Pidgin, if
> our solution wouldn't be much superior.


I don't think is fair to assume that accepting something in GNOME means
everything else is legacy. We're just certifying that the project complies
with the GNOME standards, dependencies, licence, coding style, use of
approved bindings, technologies and that fills a gap that the oficial module
set has.

It is not a regression from the GNOME point of view, but from a distribution
shipping pidgin/xchat point of view, it might be, but that's not up to us to
decide.

Accepting Ryhtmnbox means Banshee is legacy? Or the other way around? Don't
think so.

Accepting modules before they're feature complete is not a bad idea, it
would actually push some people's motivation to actively implement the
misssing bits.

Did we denied the inclusion of GIO/Gvfs despite its lack of ftp backend? No.
It was actually the fact that the ftp backend was a stopper what motivated
Benjamin to do the work, I think that wouldn't happened if we didn't pushed
GIO/Gvfs to the latest release.

On the other hand IRC is getting less and less popular nowdays, and most old
school IRC users still prefer a dedicated client like XChat. (Actually, in
my point of view, IM and IRC are two completely different use cases).

+1 for inclusion as long as licensing issues get clarified and sorted out

-- 
Un saludo,
Alberto Ruiz
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to