Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Travis Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:25 AM, Martyn Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Both libempathy and libempathy-gtk use a lot of GPL code from Gossip and >> > some of the files are not correctly attributed with the authors too I >> > noticed. >> > >> > So it is a -1 for that reason for me. >> In that case -1 from me as well. If it's not LGPL I can't use it and I >> suspect others will have the same problem. GPL for a library you want >> everyone to use doesn't make much sense. > > Try to focus on the project, not on technical (legal) problems > involved in making it part of GNOME.
Huh? What Travis said is completely pertinent. GNOME requires libraries are LGPL as I understand it, these are not. > It's their job to relicense > properly before becoming a part of desktop. If they fail then I > believe all of us will be -1. This won't happen. This was discussed last time Empathy was suggested for inclusion. -- Regards, Martyn _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
