On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 17:41 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 17:29 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 10:12 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Christian Persch <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > This single back-end will be * WebKit *. > > > > > > > > > > Hoping this is not an April Fool's joke, also. +1 > > > > I hope it's one or that Christian will help fixor Totem's browser > > plugin > > > > to not use XPCOM. > > > > > > It does not link against any part of gecko > > Yes, it does. > > Uhm... >
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] browser-plugin]$ rpm -q -R browser-plugin-totem Your RPM is missing a dependency on the mozilla/Firefox libraries. We don't link against it directly, as the linkage is resolved at run-time. We do link against it directly for xulrunner, as the API is (more) stable. > > > so does it need anything > > > more than a working copy of npapi.h? > > Yes. > > What exactly? XPCOM, the document DOM, even the Timer usage to launch the totem-plugin-viewer helper. See: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520629 And the WebKit plugin support isn't finished either: http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14750 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
