Iain, Thanks for your reply.
søn, 15 06 2008 kl. 17:56 +0100, skrev Iain *: > Why does any of this (semantics) need a new "GNOME 3"? > Can conduit not invoke Soprano in a GNOME 2 desktop? Certainly - I did not propose a new GNOME 3 for this purpose. > I don't understand the perceived need to start from scratch and make > GNOME 3 a "semantic desktop" > or an "online desktop". I did not propose to start from scratch (which I think is out of the question anyway). The "semantic desktop" merely refers to a strategy for integrating GNOME with a number of other systems. Whether this strategy is played out during 2.x or 3.x is less important. > Can you not implement semantics in applications that would benefit from it > first > Then if its useful it will get adopted by other things. Yes - that's how I would do it. It would require cooperation from application developers though, which is the reason I bring it up here. -- Anders Feder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
