Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 19:35 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit : > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 01:08 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: > > David Zeuthen wrote: > > > > > > Yes we do; at least I believe so. I won't complain about my xterms as > > > > they may be considered a legacy application but modern applications > > > > written for the other major free desktop should not be left in the > > > > cold. > > > > > > Do you have a concrete example of a modern desktop application where the > > > absence of XSMP in GNOME 2.24 would be a huge inconvenience? > > > > I think you should not limit yourself to GNOME 2.24; people are using > > other applications. > > Uh, I think you misread what I said. I was asking for examples of modern > desktop applications (e.g applications using e.g. Qt, GTK+, Swing, SWT, > E17, wxWidgets, XUL etc.) for which absence of XSMP would be a huge > inconvenience. Do you have any such examples?
Openoffice.org ? -- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mandriva _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
