On Sat, 09.08.08 17:19, Daniel E. Macks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > It doesn't appear to have a homepage, it doesn't have a bug-tracking > system that I can find (only a "discussion" mailing list that looks > like just release announcements), and its build system hard-codes
I am not sure why exactly a homepage should be necessary for a project to become an external dep. I mean, not even all libraries that make up the gnome platform have homepages. And even if they have, they are seldomly up to date. Having said that. Yes, I will set up a homepage. > things that are non-portable to non-ELF platforms. These things are Which thigns are non-portable to non-ELF? > all fixable (and inter-related, especially the infrastructure issues) > and I'd file bugs and submit patches if I knew where, etc. Even > having Just post those bug reports on the mailing list for now. Usually that's how bugs are handled "by default" for small and new projects, isn't it? Alternatively you are welcome to post them on rhbz. I've now asked for a new bz product for libcanberra on fdo, so that we can track bugs there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17114 > Even fdo, where the underlying sound-theme spec is being handled, > hasn't finished setting up infrastructure for the spec itself, > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14469 so it seems > premature to go full steam ahead on libcanberra. Hehe, complaining about how fdo administration works or doesn't work isn't really fair to libcanberra, is it? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
