On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 11:21 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:35 +0000, Benjamin Otte wrote: > > pros: > > - current proxy handling in GNOME is a huge mess, we're all lucky we can > > live > > without proxies > > - the API looks extremely sane > > - there is nothing else that does proxying > > - Dan (who is going to be the main - or only? - user of it) likes it > > - active maintainers > > - no bugs > > > > cons: > > - I'm (luckily) not too knowledgable about proxy handling > > - not a lot of users > > - yet another library, slowing applications startup.
only of those that might require a proxied connection, not every single application, which is fairly obvious. but humour me: where would you put this functionality? and saying libgnome or gtk+ is not going to cut it. ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi, W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
