On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 15:34 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Lennart Poettering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 24.10.08 20:14, Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> Contrary to what the name suggest, lighttpd is not just a lightweight > >> web server, it is a powerful and complete implementation used by some of > >> the biggest websites. > > I don't think that this kind of FUD about Apache is very > > constructive. Just because lighttpd has a "light" in its name it > > doesn't mean that Apache is a slow huge beast. That is nonsense. > > Guys, I'm very sorry for starting this thread. I didn't mean to > provoke any flame wars. I use both Apache httpd and lighttpd on > production and can assure you there is no absolute winner here. Both > daemons have their strengths and I pick one over the other depending > on the requirements of a project. I was only wondering if there was no > simpler DAV daemon we could use here (be it a small python program as > python is already used by various parts of GNOME or ideally a C > library).
The short answer is that people before me as maintainers, and myself don't want to maintain a WebDAV server. As for switching to another server, it's because I don't see any good reasons to. Patches more than welcome on the latter. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
