On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:18 AM, John Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Claudio Saavedra wrote: > >> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:10 +0000, John Carr wrote: > >>>> Lets not turn this into yet another bazaar vs. git war cause we > >>>> already had plenty of that and nothing good comes out of that. > >>> I think the vote should be down to the foundation members. > >> > >> I actually think that, if any, the vote should be down to the GNOME SVN > >> users. But all of them (or at least those who care enough to vote). > > > > Agreed. Only recently active SVN users. Why should past contributors > who do > > not commit anymore decide what DVCS tool *I* use? > > > >> Claudio > > > > behdad > > > > Don't forget sysadmins. While not active SVN users, they will have to > support whatever you demand.. Pretty sure they should have a say.. > > Personally, no one is telling me what DVCS tool *I* use. Its like > mandating I use emacs for GNOME development. Ain't gonna happen... > I have been using bzr-mirror for the past few months happily, thanks to John Carr's work I can pull from either bzr-mirror or directly from svn, and push to svn as if it was a bzr branch. I personally think that keeping svn, and maintaining bzr-mirror, git-mirror, and hopefully an hg-mirror would make everyone happy. All of bzr, hg and git provide a mean to interop with svn, while there is not always a way to interop between the various DRCS that people tend to prefer, so maybe sticking with svn for now would be the right choice ? -- Ali
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
