I've added gtk_widget_get_screen to the example code Jaap
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 23:54, Thomas H.P. Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Jaap A. Haitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Quite some people already are implementing this goal >> >> http://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/RemoveGnomeOpenGnomeHelp >> >> What about making it an official goal for GNOME 2.26? > > Would it make sense to have an official policy to accept goals > proposed on d-d-l after a few days without protests? It seems to me > that a lot of goals never took off because they were never officially > blessed. > > Comments on the gnome help goal: > We might as well set the screen correctly rather than just pass NULL. > The goal might as well suggest to use gtk_widget_get_screen on the > window to get the screen. The window is used later in the example > anyway. > > This is the definition of the gnome goals taken from l.g.o/GnomeGoals: > "Setting small concrete goals that we should all try to achieve could > definitely help with our work in integration and consistency. The > goals may vary a lot, don't need to be ambitious, don't need to be > about code. But they need to be achievable in a small timeframe. They > are the GNOME goals." > In light of this I would suggest to narrow the scope of this > particular goal to only handle modules using C. This would make it > both more concrete and easier to achieve in a small timeframe. > > Lastly, while on the topic of gnome goals, I hate the ambiguous "to > do" status. Currently I am not able to tell if it means that no one > has investigated if the module is affected by the goal or if it means > that there is work to be done for that module. > > - thomas > _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
