On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Lennart Poettering <mzta...@0pointer.de> wrote:
> Come one. First you claim the list of defined names is too large. Then > you claim it is incomplete. Then you want only a single sound for > all. Now you want to distuingish the events. Hey, make up your mind! Thats not what i've said at all. Nicely twisted into a meaningless strawman. I think the list of defined names is too long. If you are attempted to define a list of all possible different things that may have different sounds then the the list is incomplete. I was highlighting this to show that it is impossible to define all possibilties before hand in some spec, not to claim that I want more sounds. I want a single meaning for why a sound has happened. I want a simple answer to the question "should my application make a sound in this situation?" I don't want to distinguish events. I want the user to be able to know that when they hear a sound that there is something that may need their attention. > You know, we define 125 sounds. It's up to you which ones you link > to the same file and which ones you don't define at all. We already > give you the power to do whatever you want. And thats completely NOT what I want and has missed the point. But I see that no-one else cares So I shall stop caring as well. And this is my last mail on the subject Enjoy iain _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list