Hi! First of all, thanks a millions to Behdad and Elijah for taking up this task and congrats for managing to accomplish it so effectively.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Jason D. Clinton <m...@jasonclinton.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Karl Lattimer <k...@qdh.org.uk> wrote: >> I'd like to remind people of John Carr's recent blog post too, someone >> mentioned in the survey results actually. JC has been working on bzr with >> git protocol support, which would fulfil many of the requirements for having >> a GNOME DVCS. >> > > I'd like to point out that--of the 15 people who regularly use git and > bzr--git still won. > <http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/survey/first-picks-permutations.png> It > seems to me that a lot of brain power, sysadmin time, and general > proliferation of Things To Learn for New People(tm) can be saved if > the six people (1.04% of respondents) who ranked bzr above git in that > graph can just bite the bullet and admit that git won. Can we please > just all move on? > > My fear is that this effort to keep bzr on life support will cause bzr > to show up as a requirement in distcheck for modules maintained by > people who are still holding out. So say we all (?) but now is the problem of who will do the move to git? Last I checked, nobody except for Federico volunteered for that and IIRC he is going to do this using his "spare time" which we all know might not be enough for such a big task. I hope I am wrong about this and we do have enough resources to do the move but in case I am right, I think we should seriously consider John's idea. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
