On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:33 PM, Olav Vitters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:29:02PM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote: >> Uh, but that's exactly how I understood the proposal and I believe that >> the points I made (that you didn't respond to) still stands: That it's >> crazy to officially want to support git, bzr and hg *at* the same time >> *from* the same repo. It's just asking for trouble. > That isn't true. It is Bzr on server, with Git support. Nothing about > Hg, nothing about doing partly Git, partly Bzr.
The potential problem I see is all of the remote branches will use different DVCS that do not support git + hg + bzr. So eventually all of us will be forced to use all three tools in order to merge changes from remote branches (unless we expect *all* people to provide *all* changes as patches in which case I don't see the real gain of switching to a distributed tool). -- Patryk Zawadzki _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
