On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 18:58 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > Hi Bastien, > > Am Donnerstag, den 22.01.2009, 17:09 +0000 schrieb Bastien Nocera: > > => nautilus-cd-burner developers are trying to find a nice way to say > > that they're not happy about having been completely blocked out of the > > process, and not receiving a single mail about that deprecation, which > > was never discussed in the module acceptance discussions. > > One option discussed was "to take over nautilus-cd-burner completely"[1] > and the direct answer was that "The idea is to replace completely > N-C-B"[2].
Which wasn't achieved as far as I can see. > As Jon and you are subscribed to d-d-l I was confused to see you talking > about yourself in the third person ("Did you talk to the > nautilus-cd-burner devels about it?"[3]) Obviously my attempt at humour was lost on you... I was mimicking the style of the original e-mail. > and am a bit surprised that you > feel blocked out. I feel blocked out in the sense that the release team didn't contact either of Jon or myself about the deprecation, or asking for our opinion on the matter. I feel that the current solution is being forced upon us. FWIW, I never received an answer to my last question, see at the bottom of: http://www.mail-archive.com/desktop-devel-list@gnome.org/msg15147.html This is what I received before brasero created their own library: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509508 A never finished patch with loads of memory leaks. I believe this is the first case of a module being booted out of the release where the maintainers of the module replacing it weren't maintainers of the original one. And I can't say I'm pleased about how it was done. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list