> Its true that all of these *could* and *should* mark the file as > executable, however since we never demanded that before this would be a > regression for many users. Both for old created desktop files and for > new ones created by non-updated apps.
Why is this a problem ? - You can chmod the existing desktop files on an upgrade - If you meet one that appears not to have been updated you can ask the user/fix it with their permission If you are willing to be selinux aware you can also use the labels and security contexts for this _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
