On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:41 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote: > 2009/4/2 Ross Burton <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:20 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > >> * Still to discuss: dconf vs gconf. This is not yet covered by > >> this plan, but crucial to discuss (as gconf depends on > >> Bonobo) > > > > There is gconf-dbus, the long-standing port of GConf to DBus that > > Imendio did for Maemo. Moblin also ships it and it shouldn't be *too* > > difficult to merge it back[1]. > > My understanding on this after talking with Richard Hult, is that > there is no GConf maintainer, and the DBus port is a huge hack and not > really suitable for the main branch, and that a proper merge would > need a lot of work.
Is it more or less work than finishing the replacement, and porting all the apps and developer documentation, as well as writing porting documentation? _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
